Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

wall and floor tiles and accessories
 
 
Sunday, 14th March 2010

GPs urge people to get protected

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 February 2010
LEADING GPs and public health experts in Cumbria are calling on more people to get protected in the wake of the recent damming verdict on the research which led to the MMR controversy.
Dr Andrew Wakefield's 1998 Lancet study linking the jab to autism caused vaccination rates to plummet, resulting in a rise in measles - but the findings were later discredited.

The General Medical Council ruled last week that he had acted "disho
nestly and irresponsibly" in doing his research.

Clinicians in the county hope the ruling will prompt more people who qualify for vaccinations to get protected.

Dr Peter Weaving, one of NHS Cumbria's lead GPs, said: "Take-up rates for the MMR vaccine have gradually recovered since Dr Wakefield first made his claims but there are still a lot of people in the county who aren't protected from a number of common infections who could be.

"It is upsetting to see kids and adults in the surgery, sometimes quite unwell, with illnesses such as measles and mumps which are now wholly preventable.

"I would strongly urge anyone who qualifies for a vaccination to make sure they get their jab, and get protected."

Dr Nigel Calvert, associate director for public health at NHS Cumbria, said: "Walk around any graveyard in Cumbria and you will see the names of children who a hundred years ago died from diseases which are now preventable thanks to medical advancements in vaccines.

"It is crucially important that if you are invited for a jab that can protect you or your family from measles, mumps rubella, swine flu or any other avoidable illness, not to leave it to chance: take it up."

Information on the range of immunisations and vaccinations available can be found at http://www.immunisation.nhs.uk/



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 February 2010 11:57 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Lakeland
 
Prev
1
Next
1

autist,

london 01/02/2010 22:30:39
Perhaps late onset autistic children, whom were previously normal, might also be more upsetting to a majority of GP's,mine included, whom are getting on with their job,listening to parents and evaluating their children,without entering into one sided statements.Autism is a general term for a spectrum of autistic disorders.Some are born autistic and genetics used to be the prime suspect.Genetic disorders don't increase.But late onset autism has increased off the graph. It is now far more familiar to most GP's than measles and hardly anyone has not come across a friend or colleague, who has an autistic child.I had measles as a child and so did all my friends.It was then described as a mild illness.We had never heard of autism.What is more important, bolstering MMR, through NHS speak campaigns, debunking researchers whom dared to investigate or tackling the reasons why autism now affects 1 in 64 ? Better diagnosis? No way.The prosecution of the first Emeritus Professor of gasroenterology and two of his colleagues,one, another professor and Dr Wakefield,with no complaint made from the parents of their patients and their total support, has cast a deep shadow on autism research and future treatment of late onset autistic children in pain.All of their parents had their children given the MMR in the first place, along with all childhood vaccines and have since been labelled as anti vaccine.The message is clear. If your child suffers an adverse reaction to a vaccine,which like any medicinal product, has some risk, you and any mainstream medical researcher, whom dares to investigate, will be subjected to a campaign, costing NHS millions, to discredit you.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.